One would have thought this to be
AI generated metaphor on britishery. This bloodcurdling photograph of a pedophile,
so-called prince of british medieval theatrics, a middle-aged man lasciviously hovering
over what looks like a child (who could be murdered or cannibalized, it is difficult to sieve fact
from fiction in this horror), in smug self-assuredness that is least bothered about
being photographed in such horrible circumstance, is real. He is a serial
offender who could be easily flagged decades ago and is very likely power
echelons were aware hence normalized. This fellow lived and fed on common
people while state protected him. This hypocrisy of feudal system normalized ascriptive
entitlements while claiming to be democracy is the core of britishery. Also note,
these have remained unchanged from colonial era for its pride and posturing that
makes it sinister presence. It is no brainer that ascriptive value system
hinges on exceptionalism and supremacist ideas. They are in direct contradiction
with ideas of liberty and freedom that values individual right and humanistic
concerns asserted through collective expressions of democracy. What is also
deeply troubling is that britishery nurtured feduals as birthright in parliament
(even carrying obnoxious titles like lords -these are emulated by worst in
erstwhile colonies to show their entitlement) as also religion as sacred representation.
High sounding semantics and debating skills twisted reality and presented compromised
Britain as thriving democracy. Since they had to playact as civilized concerned
people while indulging in colonial luxury and burden of deeply flawed system it
created bottomless angst vacuum. In this vacuum they dumped worst from other societies
to fill in the lacunae and distraction as they position themselves as benign. In
the name of multiculturalism (which has nothing to do with britishery narrated degradation)
they welcomed the worst on the hapless people. Caste cannibals and monster
mullahs have found new meaning in british accent that is trained as marker of high
intelligence in erstwhile colonies. The way the so-called prince of british medieval
theatrics is grabbing over child is terrifying metaphor of disdain that british
elite carry for its own common people as they feed them to brutes who pose as migrants
(there are rising chilling evidence of pandering to brutes as they increase in
numbers). Horrible people posing as migrants shouldn’t be part of any civilized
society. A migrant by its least definition and expectation are decent people
who are looking for better life and opportunities to grow and contribute to their
host country. A host country must be enriched by the progressive diversity that is brought in
as also professional skills that contributes. Common people around the world
cannot be dictated by depraved elite to accept barbarians in the name of migrants
who bring nothing but severe degradation and revivalist backlash, while crucial
issues that matter to common people are sidelined and valued liberal space diminish.
As can be seen in Britain it nurtures cunning people as leaders. They have no
values nor any understanding except excessively pandering and appearing liberal
in a narrative that is handed. Stuttering Starmer -disgrace in human form, is
next in line of this hypocrisy as it spreads to britishery controlled value
system in Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Objectivity is not being neutral
when the foundation of the world that you cherish, indeed your humanity is hinged
on, is being bludgeoned. Liberal values cannot be compromised nor rule of law diluted.
Feudal nurturing system compromise these and are foundationally weak hence the
hypocrisy to cover the flaw that is capitalized by worst people.
What is not studied, and understandably
not given much attention, is how much britishery has severely degraded erstwhile
colonies as it was nurtured in worst of possibilities. The fledgling democracies
in societies with varying degrees of barbarity (in the modern estimation of civilized
norms) were embedded with hypocrisy of britishery. It can easily be traced in India
as normalization of depraved values that playact democracy while the beleaguered
society doesn’t even understand basics of democracy nor values of liberty. It is
much worst in other societies as it promoted blatant corruption and
exploitation in African continent and in miracle book driven societies the
horror is multifold. Meanwhile corrupt elite from these corrupt nations sent
litters to Britain to exact semantics of concern and complexity of civilized posturing
with much sturdier liberal mask. Ofcourse in recent times these chicaneries have
collapsed with social media. British accent is now mostly equated to stupidity.
Rule of law hinges collective
aspirations of democracy into equality and a social contract of fairness based on
civilized values. It is informed to plebs (one fellow even called common people
peasants) that this so-called prince of british medieval theatrics of horror
and ridicule is being removed from this ‘title’! The left and right end of
britishery nurtured media in UK reported this as moral victory! The audacity.
Nobody is interested in these ridiculous non measures. Rule of law is what
matters, not only nationally but also internationally, it defines principles of
democracy and human rights. This so-called british prince must be arrested and
treated with contempt that he deserves. And so must be the system that nurtured
him and institutions that protected him. This is peak britishery. The same set
of people who had the audacity to include thuggery into English.
